Tim Walz Opposes 1st Amendment: Apparently Democrat Leaders Agree
This story in the Federalist shows how much of a leftist radical Tim Walz is. Anyone who observes a biblical religion will be prohibited from being licensed as a teacher in Minnesota and from teaching in schools.
Read the story! Walz is not a "Minnesota nice" person. He is a radical leftist actively working to undermine biblical values and the foundations of Western Civilization.
Remember, he does not support freedom of speech if the speaker is saying something hurtful or inaccurate. Who decides that? Obviously the government since only it can fine people or throw them in prison. Watch the entire embedded video clip or start at 3:45 to save some time. Our first amendment codifies our divinely given right of free speech. It also protects the government from interfering with religion or establishing a religion (woke leftism is the religion of Democrat Party leadership).
Tim Walz was apparently a social studies teacher. Why is he so ignorant of America's constitution and traditions? Or, perhaps more accurately, why does he dismiss and undermine them? As a National Guard member, Congressman, and Governor, Tim Walz took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. He is actively violating his oath by attacking it. It is obvious he will continue to do so if he takes the oath as VP.
Kamala Harris picked this person to be her running mate. She owns Walz's record as well. She also took an oath to defend and protect the Constitution, but her selection of Tim Walz contradicts that. In fact, all Democrat leaders, public officials, and candidates who do not actively denounce these attacks on our freedom are complicit in violating it and violating their oaths (or prospective oaths) of office. If they won't push back against this when Harris and Walz are still candidates for President and VP, there is no reason to expect them to push back if they get elected and actually hold positions of greater power than they already have.
Hold local Democrat leaders such as candidates for public office accountable if they agree with these policies. Ask them whether they actively oppose those policies and how they have done so.
Comments
Post a Comment